# Blueprint Workshop — fictional acceptance example

Template version: 1.0.0.

**This entire file is a fictional training scenario. No server was allocated for this example, no GPU was tested, and no performance figures are provided.** Role titles do not refer to real people.

## Proposed scope

The Blueprint Workshop wants to produce a searchable index from a test corpus of twelve technical documents. The team is considering an H100 configuration, subject to software compatibility and measured need. It claims neither an actually allocated variant, nor accessible memory, nor throughput.

The twelve documents and their count are an organizational assumption. The case targets a queue of independent jobs: one output per identifier, then an index that references all outputs. This is not a distributed test across GPUs.

## Criteria decided in the scenario

- Each input identifier has a readable output.
- The index references each output once, with no omissions and no duplicate references.
- The application and its dependencies are identified before the test.
- The model and the number of accessible devices will be verified.
- The test batch must be exported and opened from its final destination.
- A controlled interruption must allow resuming without duplicate publication.
- No performance threshold is defined in this example; it therefore cannot conclude that performance is sufficient.

## Fictional roles

| Role | Expected action |
|---|---|
| Project lead | Define the scope and authorize its go-live |
| Application lead | Prepare versions, launch, and resume |
| Operations | Check allocation, paths, permissions, and transfer |
| Results lead | Open the outputs and check the index |

## Illustrative review status

The corpus and criteria are described in the training file. The hardware, application, and resume tests have not been run. The retention destination is planned in the scenario, but the export has not been reviewed.

The attached grid `exemple-fictif.csv` therefore contains nine checks not run and one blocked export check. The "preuve_reference" column remains empty: no fictional path is presented as a real log. The date and unit columns also remain empty in the absence of a test.

## Fictional decision

**Go-live blocked.** The file does not contain the evidence needed to authorize the full chain.

The next action for operations is to carry out the inventory and test transfer; the application lead must run the cycle and the resume; the results lead must open the export and check the index. The project lead can only revisit the decision with the corresponding items.

This decision illustrates a working method. It does not describe an incident at Capordia, an existing customer, or a measured limitation of the H100.